Tag Archives: genre

Making Lemonade

I spent the first half of today feeling discouraged, and the second half of today feeling like my writing is so terrible that I shouldn’t waste my time trying to get published. In other words, I had my normal response to a partial-manuscript rejection.

By this evening, I had straightened around to deciding that I should at least consider an idea proposed by the agent that would, in her opinion, increase my likelihood of securing representation:
Drumroll, please…

Switch it from YA to MG.

This agent is not the first to suggest that Jim and Jack has a Middle Grade feel to it. Two of my critique partners also mentioned this, but I have stayed true to my original vision of the novel being for gifted eighth-grade boys (as well as a grade or two in both directions).

Why?

1. Boys mature at a significantly slower rate than girls during those tween/lower teen years.

2. Boys are generally not as emotionally complex as girls (read The Male Brain, by Louann Brizendine, MD, if you disagree with this. If you are still doubt, go make friends with a 12-15 year old boy.)

The Male Brain

3. Gifted kids of both sexes are known for their asynchronous development, in that their emotional maturity frequently lags behind their intellectual prowess.

4. 1929 (in which half of Jim and Jack is set) was a simpler time in many ways. Even though adolescents typically had more responsibilities at a younger age, frequently getting married right out of high school, there was a naiveté that doesn’t exist today. Society as a whole was more focused on developing character rather than on “being cool,” and I want that lack of sophistication to be reflected in my 1929 characters.

5. Just to make sure I was right, I had my manuscript test driven by ten 12-to 16-year-old gifted boys (nine of whom did not know me) before I started querying. On response sheets, in answer to the question, “Do you think you were the right age to read this novel? Why, or why not? What age would you think IS the right age?” every one of them thought that theirs was exactly the right age, for various reasons. Which says to me that it is right on target.

I am willing to consider the change, though. Clinging to my rationale won’t bring Jim and Jack any closer to publication. As the litmus test, I have recruited my reluctant-reader middle grade son to read it. If he likes it, I will pitch it differently and see what happens.

They say that you know you’re getting closer when you start to get personalized rejections. We’ll see.

1 Comment

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing

Pigeonholing Your Manuscript (or) Helpful Hints for Genre ID

My mother’s aunt was a rather well-known artist, Nell Walker Warner. Although she started out her career in Hollywood, painting backdrops for silent movies, in the 1920’s and 30’s she became part of a school of painters known as the California Impressionists. She was known primarily for her floral still lifes and seascapes, but I know her work best by the family portraits that still hang in my parents’ home.

A few years back, a cousin discovered that Auntie Nell’s paintings had gone up in value, and scoured the internet to discern the worth of paintings still held by the family. In addition to the portraits, various relatives retain a variety of florals, a seascape, a watercolor of Venice and a small view of a path with mountains behind it. Much to his dismay, he found that while the florals and seascape were worth notice, the others were considerably less valuable because their subjects were not what the artist was known for. Same artist, same quality, some even larger in size (with art, bigger is frequently better), but not the right genre.

Genre is an interesting animal, hard to define, typically trendy, and sometimes elusive. It is a classification used primarily to drive book sales, to direct a potential buyer to the right area of the bookstore, which makes it more likely to be found and purchased. It also serves as a publishing gatekeeper to ensure that saturation levels are identified, so as not to clog the market. Chick Lit, for example, is “full” these days, unless the manuscript is a knockout. 

These classifications are great, as long as one has written something clearly identifiable. To the person behind the keyboard, genre is frequently of secondary interest. Many writers (myself included) have written entire novels without considering genre until query letter time. As a result, the typical manuscript is a blend of genres, and the typical author is confused about what to call it.

Amazon.com currently lists their book categories as: Nonfiction, Professional & Technical, Children’s Books, Literature & Fiction, Reference, Entertainment, Computers & Internet, Arts & Photography, History, Science, Business & Investing, Science Fiction & Fantasy, Mystery & Thrillers, Religion & Spirituality, Biographies & Memoirs, Romance, Gay & Lesbian, Health, Mind & Body, Teens, Comics & Graphic Novels, Travel, Cooking, Food & Wine, Medicine, Sports, Outdoors & Nature, Home & Garden, Law, and Parenting & Families.

That’s a start, but what about Urban Fantasy, Cosy Mystery, Amish Romance, and the rest of those offshoots that agents (and editors) seem to care so much about? In an effort to end the confusion, I have scoured the internet for articles on identifying genre. Here are some of the best:

Agent Query:
http://agentquery.com/genre_descriptions.aspx

Writing to Publish:
http://www.cuebon.com/ewriters/genres.html

Jill Terry:
wordsmithextraordinaire.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/literary-genres/

Nathan Bransford:
http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2008/10/commercial-fiction.html

And two that I just found this morning, thanks to Elizabeth Craig and her wonderful Twitter posts (it must be Unofficial Genre Day):

Stephanie L. McGee:
http://novicewriterchronicles.blogspot.com/2010/04/genre-adventure.html

Katie Lovett:
http://katie-lovett.com/2010/03/15/blending-genres/

With the help of these experts, your YA-Historical-Adventure-Literary Fiction-Romance-Family Saga will soon be folded neatly into an acceptable (and hopefully marketable) literary classification. Good luck!

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized