Category Archives: Writing

Where the Boys Are

Ty Roth wrote a blog post yesterday about the lack of YA “boy books” and male authors who write them. I started to write a comment, but it got so long that I’ve turned it into a post.

There was a time when a lot of books for boys were being published. I know this, because when I was young, my big brother’s room was closer than the local library and I was lazy, so I used to raid his bookcase.  I was rewarded with finds like My Side of the Mountain, Gull Number 737, The Mad Scientists Club, and a lot of other good “boy books” that were popular those days.

At school, the books we had to read were also “boy books” (Shane, The Call of the Wild, Johnny Tremain, etc.). When we girls complained, the teachers would say it was because girls would read “boy books” but boys didn’t like “girl books.” I knew this to be true from personal experience, and when the trend continued in high school with A Separate Peace, The Great Gatsby and The Old Man and the Sea, I didn’t think too much about it. The books were good, and if I needed a “girl book” fix, I could just go to the library.

Times have changed. My going-into-sixth-grade son has had to read Caddie Woodlawn, Sarah Plain and Tall, Alice in Wonderland, and a host of other “girl books” at school. Consequently, he has become so turned off by what he perceives as fiction that I’ve had to bribe him with computer time to get him to read it at all. When I take him to the library, there are virtually no good modern “boy books,” and all but the classics have been sold off at library sales, so he’s been borrowing Jules Verne.

I’ve had the gut feeling that if he just read the right book, he would see that reading can be fun as well as informative. After a lot of thought, and one failed attempt with From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler (another “girl book”), I have finally hooked him with one of the titles from my brother’s bookcase, The Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet. He read it on his own, and actually asked me if I would buy the sequel for him.

I suspect that the well-meaning movement to empower girls in the 1980’s and 90’s spawned an inadvertent backlash against boy titles as the girls of my generation became agents, editors and teachers. It’s nice that girls are able to read things in school now that interest them, but the boys should at least be able to find something that they like at the library.

Gull Number 737My Side of the Mountain

The Mad Scientists' Club (Mad Scientist Club)Wonderful Flight To the Mushroom Planet

7 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Reading, Uncategorized, Writing

Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce…

Fast food restaurants are famous for doing market research to pinpoint their customers’ needs, but what teen consumers are looking for in a novel is sometimes obscured by assumptions on the part of Young Adult writers.

Most authors know that teenagers like to read books about kids who are a few years older than themselves, and that girls will read “boy books,” but boys don’t usually like to read “girl books” (at least in public). Beyond that, many writers seem to think that if their protagonist is a young adult, the manuscript qualifies as YA.

In fact, there are numerous aspects to consider when penning a developmentally appropriate novel. Teens usually enjoy works in which they can identify with the protagonist, but in situations that are out of the ordinary. They like to see how a character tackles a problem, and then reflect on what they might have done in a similar situation. Coming-of-age stories are always popular, as are stories where teens somehow best the adults, or prove themselves through adversity, or fight and win an underdog cause, or find out that something they’d been led to believe isn’t true. Good vs. evil and the suspense of a character making the “right” choice instead of the “wrong” one seems to hold a particular fascination.

“Young Adult” is currently defined by the American Library Association as ranging in age from 10-25. Many writers informally classify their work as “Young YA” or “Mature YA,” because of the disparity in emotional development within that age group.* Ignoring this aspect of the genre can actually be detrimental to the reader. One of my sisters, a pediatric nurse, recently attended a lecture given by a psychologist who said it is not uncommon for teens to experience intense anxiety and other problems because of reading material that they aren’t emotionally ready for.**

There’s a lot to think about when authoring content for that diverse group, and writers need to make sure that their product is suitable for the target market. Fast food chains are coming under fire for providing what kids want at the expense of what is healthful. No one expects them to serve broccoli, but with a little creativity, they should be able to come up with something nourishing that also satisfies the palate.

*See my previous post, “Considering Asychronous Development in Book Selection.”

**Victoria Mixon just blogged about this topic on June 15th, and it’s worth a read.

5 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Reading, Uncategorized, Writing

Take the Hint

I used to have a boss who felt that the universe gave him messages about his life. He was constantly saying things like, “I’ve run into three people lately who have problems with alcohol. I think that the universe is trying to tell me something.” He would then lay off drinking for a week or two, until the universe told him to do something different.

If I were him, I would think that the universe is trying to tell ME something right now.

My manuscript, Jim and Jack, was originally literary fiction, but thanks to a lot of online advice, I have reluctantly morphed it into something more commercial. Although the story is definitely more streamlined, it is no longer the relaxing summer’s day that it was, and I don’t think that it’s as good in many ways. A few things have improved, such as the action starting earlier, but overall, it sounds just like everybody else’s “voice” these days. This has bothered me so much that I’ve even stopped querying, paralyzed about which version to send if I get another request.

Until this week. My author-hero Ty Roth posted about this very topic. So did literary agent Rachelle Gardner. Victoria Mixon had a superb (and I NEVER use that word) post about young adult literature and how all of the edgy/disturbing YA stuff isn’t healthy for kids, and when I left a comment, she replied with, “Layinda, aim for your star. Forget the nay-sayers. Nobody knows what’s going to sell, only that trends are started by people with the guts to go where no one else is going. “We are the makers of manners, Kate.”—Henry V

Now, I don’t think that the universe tells anybody anything, but these posts have resonated with me, and my mind is made up. I am going back to the original version, and I will let the professionals decide whether my manuscript is any good or not. From what I understand, there are always rewrites anyway. 

If you missed any of these excellent posts, here are the links:

Ty Roth:
http://tyroth.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/the-secret-to-my-success/

Rachelle Gardner:
http://cba-ramblings.blogspot.com/2010/06/write-from-your-heart-or-follow-trends.html

Victoria Mixon: http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2010/06/14/honestly-or-sensationally-addressing-ya-taboos/comment-page-1/#comment-143

8 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing

Author Series – Gone but Not Forgotten: Gene Stratton-Porter

Gene Stratton-Porter was born in Lagro, Indiana on August 17, 1863. Christened Geneva Grace, she was the youngest of twelve children. When Geneva was three, her mother was taken ill with typhoid fever and never fully recovered, so the little girl spent most of her early years outdoors in the company of her father and brothers. During this time, she fed baby birds in the nest, collected moths and generally immersed herself in nature. When she was twelve her mother died, and the family spent the next several years moving between the homes of Gene’s married sisters.

Gene Age 10

In 1883, Gene met Charles D. Porter at a religious revival. Three years later, she married the successful pharmacist and the couple built a home, “Limberlost,” by the Limberlost Swamp near Geneva, Indiana. They later built another residence, “The Cabin in Wildflower Woods,” located near Rome City. (Both are now Indiana State Historic Sites.)

An early environmentalist, Gene wrote popular novels for young adults that took place in natural settings. After achieving financial success as an author, Stratton-Porter developed her own production company in Los Angeles, and most of her books were made into movies. On December 6, 1924, she died in a streetcar accident during one of her trips to California. She was fifty-one years old. After Stratton-Porter’s death, her only daughter, Jeannette Porter Meehan, wrote sequels to several of her mother’s novels.

During her lifetime, Gene Stratton-Porter wrote a total of twelve novels, the most famous of which were Freckles and A Girl of the Limberlost. She also wrote nature studies and books of poetry. It is estimated that she had a readership of fifty-million at the time that she died. Most of her titles are still in print, and are also available as free Kindle downloads from Amazon.com.

Gene Stratton-Porter: A Little Study of Her Life and Work, published by Doubleday, Page and Company in 1915 and again in 1926, is an excellent biography created largely from the author’s personal records and writings. It can be viewed online at http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/stratton/gene/gene.html

Freckles


———-

The Keeper of the Bees (Library of Indiana Classics)


Sources:

Gene Stratton Porter State Historic Site
http://www.genestratton-porter.com/Biography.html

Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Stratton-Porter

Lesson Tutor
http://www.lessontutor.com/eesStrattonPorter.html

Indiana State Museum
http://www.indianamuseum.org/sites/gene.html

Our Tentative Times
http://www.tentativetimes.net/porter/limber2a.html

Penn Libraries
http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/stratton/gene/gene.html

Google Images
http://www.google.com/images?client=safari&rls=en-us&q=gene+stratton-porter&oe=UTF-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=EkUVTJyTJcKC8gaMk5SbCg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4&ved=0CD8QsAQwAw

The Literature Network
http://www.online-literature.com/stratton-porter/

Our Land, Our Literature
http://www.bsu.edu/ourlandourlit/literature/authors/portergs.htm

Gene Stratton-Porter and her Limberlost Swamp
http://www.genestrattonporter.net/

2 Comments

Filed under Author Biographies, Miscellaneous, Reading, Writing

I Really Should Be Working…

I have posted previously about the benefits of procrastinating. It allows the subconscious to have some important incubation time, helps clear out the mental cobwebs, and diffuses inner conflict on days when writing is more of a struggle than a joy.

In the spirit of providing tools for avoiding writer’s block, I have annotated a few good, free websites that are a wonderful way to change gears while scoring some brownie points with the inner child. 

braingle.com
This site is a storehouse of brain teasers and mental challenges to delight even the most self-disciplined of writers. 

Goodhousekeeping.com
You might be happy to just read the articles on this website, but if you go to the “games” section, you will be even happier. Spliterature and Mah Jong Dimensions are two of my favorites. Note: you have to scroll to the bottom of the home page to find the correct tab.

TestQ.com
Lots of fun and informative tests to take, that range from measuring your I.Q. to determining what your favorite color says about you. This site is a pleasant way to pass the time when you really should be researching the proper way to write a query letter. 

Facebook.com
I guess I don’t really need to describe this one, but I can highly recommend the Scrabble Beta game.

Lego.com
It’s not just for kids anymore. There are many terrific games on this website (category: Play) that will engage even the mature writer. My favorite is Junkbot, where you have to guide a lego robot across a series of blocks that gets more challenging with every level.

Note: A good trick to keep the goofing-off to a manageable level is to set a timer. When the buzzer goes off, get back to work.


2 Comments

Filed under Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing

Que(ry) Sera, Sera.

Getting rejected is no fun. It’s part of the writing game, though, and so instead of complaining about it, it’s a good time to take stock.

If you are lucky enough to get a personalized rejection, you at least have some feedback to consider. Whether the agent didn’t connect with your work, or if they’re already repping a similar manuscript, you can take that for what it’s worth and continue on.

A form letter is a different animal (and don’t think that they don’t happen with partials/fulls). You have no idea why your work has been rejected, what might be wrong with it, or how to fix it. You can guess, but should you go to the trouble of rewriting, or just assume that you haven’t hit the right agent yet?

Critique partners and beta readers can be helpful, to an extent, but in the end, you are still the one who decides whether their suggestions  are good ones or not. If you are getting the same comments over and over, like, “it doesn’t flow well,” or, “your main character is unlikable,” it’s time to pay attention and do some editing. Otherwise, just keep an open mind, and keep researching agents/sending query letters.

Sooner or later, you’ll hit the jackpot, or you’ll write something better, or you’ll crawl into a literary hole and decide that maybe writing wasn’t the life for you, anyway.

However it works out, it will.

3 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing

Make Way for Goslings

This morning, I was heading East in the left hand lane of the highway when I spied two Canada Geese and their six or so goslings strutting out from the grassy median, headed for the pavement. As soon as I passed, the parents hurried their babies into the road, and my eyes were glued to the rear-view mirror to check out their fate. “Hurry up, Goosies!” I rooted.

They had a good shot at it, as there were no more cars for about a quarter mile, and that one switched lanes in time to avoid a collision. I held my breath until the family got across, happy to see them arrive at the other side. They still had an off-ramp to negotiate, but as far as I was concerned, they were safe. Directing my attention back to the road, I realized that before their trek across the eastbound lanes, the geese had already crossed one off-ramp and the two westbound lanes. 

The parents had seemed to wait for traffic to clear before heading across the highway, but I was impressed that they would take such a risk. Geese are notoriously overprotective of their offspring. Anyone who has ever come too close to a goose with goslings knows that they will hiss, bite and even chase you away if you get too close. The search for a better grazing field must have been imperative.

It occurred to me that writers basically go through all of the stages of eggdom with our manuscripts. An idea presents itself, and we incubate it with our time and creativity until a story hatches out. We nurture our fuzzy chick through the editing process until it is time to send it out into the world of querying to see if it will fly. Sometimes we are driven to make our way through the field of writing groups and critique partners to strengthen and rework our writing for the best results. With vigilance, a lot of luck and a little encouragement from our friends, we make it to the other side in one piece, hopefully wiser and with the experience needed to continue the journey.

Go, geese!

3 Comments

Filed under Writing

Ghost from the Past: Elements of the Modern Novel

I fell asleep last Saturday night with the TV on. When I woke up in the morning, the movie Ghost was just starting. Ghost is my brother’s favorite movie, but I had never seen it. Twenty years of mild curiosity (and my reluctance to crawl out of bed before I absolutely had to) overcame me, and I flopped back onto the pillows to watch.

It didn’t take long to see why the film was such a hit, and not much more time to realize that the movie includes many elements of a good novel. (Note: I am assuming that everyone else has already seen Ghost. If you haven’t, head over to Netflix before you read any further —I don’t want to spoil it for anyone.)

1. Hook the Reader:
After some eerie but beautiful music and a brief pan of what appears to be a dusty attic space, the film literally breaks into the action with a sledgehammer through a wall. We are immediately introduced to the main characters (Sam and Molly) and their relationship. Once a reader is hooked, he/she will keep reading.

2. Work in backstory as you go along:
Imperceptibly, we see by his inclusion in the demolition that the couple is friends with Carl, and that he is a coworker of Sam. Swiftly, the viewer realizes that they are bankers, and just as swiftly, that secret codes are best kept secret. Backstory is more easily digested when it is revealed as needed.

3. Only include information that advances the plot or exposes character (to paraphrase Mr. Vonnegut):
We never do find out why the lovebirds seem to have no close friends except for the bad guy, but that doesn’t really matter. If it’s not pertinent to the story, the reader can live without it.

4. Weave in subplots: Oda Mae’s history of being a con artist messes up the original plan of convincing Molly that she needs to protect herself. It is also intriguing that the subway ghost seems to have been a victimized homeless person, and the $4 mil check ends up benefitting a homeless shelter. Subplots lend meaning to a story.

5. Don’t forget the twists: Carl’s character is an impressive source of the unexpected. First, he turns out to be the enemy instead of a friend, THEN he comes on to Molly after Sam’s death, and instead of being scared away by Sam’s ghost, he blackmails him with a threat on Molly’s life. Twists keep the reader engaged.

6. Give the reader the inside scoop:
The audience knows that Carl is the bad guy, but somehow, Sam just doesn’t get it. The suspense is in whether or not he will figure it out before it is too late, and the viewer is worried for him and Molly. A reader will root for a character who is at risk but doesn’t know it.

7. Include some foreshadowing:
There is plenty of foreshadowing in Ghost. “Can you keep a secret?” asks Sam of Carl, right before he goes on to tell him  about the confusion with the accounts. (We know how that turns out!) Later, a ghost mentions in passing [pun intended] that entering someone else’s body is debilitating, but we forget all about that until Sam is suddenly stricken after a visit á la Oda Mae. We also get a dash of premonition when the hospital ghost says that the dead guy was lucky to go to heaven, because sometimes it goes the other way. Foreshadowing adds dimension to a problem/conflict. 

8. Focus on character development: When Sam is first dead, he is completely powerless. As the film progresses, he grows in ghostly knowledge and capabilities, seeking out other ghosts to teach him. He also discovers Oda Mae and achieves his goal of communicating with Molly. By the end of the story, he has used his hard earned skills to save the her. Oda Mae changes from being a con artist to fulfilling her destiny as a ghost whisperer and making a positive difference in people’s lives. Carl experiences character development as well, going from getting involved with the wrong guys to being responsible for a murder. In greedy desperation, he turns into a murderous villain, himself. Character arcs are integral to good storytelling. 

9. Fake out the reader for more suspense: We think that the action is on its way to being wrapped up, with the murderer gone and Sam in full possession of his ghostly capabilities, but he is unexpectedly weakened at the moment of crisis, and we don’t know what is going to happen. Lead the reader through a maze of possibilities to heighten the tension.

1o. Incorporate themes: The most obvious themes in Ghost are “good vs. evil,” and “love conquers all.” Without them, Ghost would be just another urban paranormal. Archetypes grab the reader on a gut level.

11. Denouement:
Immediately after Carl bites the dust and heads South, the pace slows, and we enjoy a leisurely stroll to the end of the film. The swirling light from heaven enables Molly to see and hear her beloved, and there is a tender moment between them as they say goodbye for the last time. The film wraps up with Sam departing for the great beyond. After the crisis has passed, let the reader catch their breath.

12. Tie up loose ends:
Both bad guys are dead, Sam and Molly have exchanged words of love, Oda Mae has turned over a new leaf. Conclusion achieved. Don’t leave unanswered questions (unless you plan a sequel).

A lot of things have changed in twenty years, including Demi Moore’s nose, but the elements of good storytelling will never die.

4 Comments

Filed under Writing

What Makes a Classic?

I was reading on an agent’s blog today about the fact that there are, as we all know, trends in publishing. Right now, it seems that prologues and adverbs are out. So is reality (for YA, anyway). So are boy books. So is literary fiction, unless it’s really great.

Most of the time, the books that ride the waves of these trends wash up on the literary shore and are taken away by the next tide. We can all name some of those. A few, however, rest like like shells on a beach, picked up by the discerning eye and treasured. We can all name some of those, as well.

What sets these books apart? I happen to be a member of AQ Connect, and there is always dismay when a prizewinning novelist seems to break all the rules. Adverbs abound, there is a 30-page prologue, the author tells instead of showing. Why is it that people who try to follow the rules have such a hard time making it, while people who break them can be stars?

Agents write about how they cannot exactly say why a book has “it,” just that they know it when they see it. Charles Dickens had “it,” as did Jane Austen, Louisa May Alcott, L.M. Montgomery, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Harper Lee. Many of their works still enjoy a shelf at the bookstore, although ironically, there is plenty of discussion online as to whether those authors would even be able to get an agent today, let alone get published.

Many agents are not shy to admit that they frequently turn down work that they love, because they don’t know for certain that they could get a publisher to buy it, but in the same breath, they say that you shouldn’t write for the market. I, myself, loosely follow the advice of Madelyn L’Engle: “You have to write the book that wants to be written.” (And worry about getting published later.) I’ll let you know how that goes.

Leave a comment

Filed under Critical Thinking, Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing

A Bird in a Gilded Cage

I think that computers are marvelous, and feel blessed every time my fingers fly across the keyboard. Words seem to shoot directly from my head onto the screen.

I remember HATING to write when I was in high school — my hand would always cramp up, and longhand was so slow. When I tried to write fast enough to keep up with my thoughts, I wouldn’t be able to read it afterwards.

My first manuscript was written on my computer at home, in our cave of a study. I appreciated the ease of putting my thoughts down, editing, etc., and being able to do research at the drop of a hat via the internet, although it was a little lonely.

Last fall, I finally got a laptop. I wasn’t aware of feeling caged before, but now I feel like I have been set free. No place is off limits. The library, the park, restaurants, even my car when I’m waiting to pick up my sons from piano lessons… you name it, I’ve written there. It’s the best of both worlds; no one bothers you, but you are still connected to the sea of humanity milling pleasantly around.

My favorite place to go in the wintertime is Starbucks. They have a wonderfully cozy fireplace right next to the little table where I like to write. You do have to purchase something, but I can think of worse torture than a cup of hot cocoa and a muffin. Somehow, I always feel slightly naughty when I write there, like I’m getting away with something, but in a good way.

Where do you write?

2 Comments

Filed under Miscellaneous, Uncategorized, Writing