Monthly Archives: March 2010

The Book Hook

My ten-year-old doesn’t like to read fiction. If you give him The Boy’s Book of Everything, he’ll read it from cover to cover, but offer him a story and he won’t even pick it up. I’ve secretly blamed it on the fact that he’s been pushed to read things at school that are developmentally inappropriate, which he has, but — what I’m really afraid of is that he’s not a “reader.” I’ve told him that he just hasn’t read the right book yet, but he doesn’t seem to care that there might be a fiction lover hiding within. When we go to the library, he grudgingly picks out a few non-fiction titles, and I always throw a few of my old favorites into the basket in hopes that I might lure him to the “other side.”

At the library with him a few days ago, I searched out, From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler. He was unimpressed when I told him that it was about kids who hide in a museum, and I knew the next time I’d see it would be when we brought it back. That evening, I was checking my email when he started begging me to get off the computer so that he could go online. About to tell him “no,” I had a brainwave. “I’ll let you have half an hour of computer time for every fifteen minutes you spend reading that book.”

To my surprise, he paused. “Fine.” I must have started to look a little too excited, because after a moment, he changed his mind. “Nevermind, it’s not worth it.” I felt like a fisherman who let the big one get away.

Tonight, though, he walked into the kitchen after dinner and said, “If I read that book for half an hour, can I go on the computer for an hour?”

“Yup,” I said, trying to appear nonchalant.

“Where is it?”

I told him, and he sat down at the ktichen table to read. “Why don’t you go sit in one of those comfy chairs in the living room?” I lured. Then I walked away like I didn’t care. When I returned, he’d moved. I found him sunken into the couch cushions, reading. He actually had an absorbed look on his face. As I cleaned up the kitchen, pretending to ignore him, I kept sneaking peeks at him, turning pages. Bizarrely, a swell of pride filled my chest. My son, reading one of my favorite books from when I was that age. I imagined a future with him sitting quietly in the living room, enjoying all of my old books. I turned back to the sink.

“Has it been half an hour, yet?” He was standing behind me. It had only been nine minutes.

“Is it really that bad?”

“No,” he said. “I just want to go on the computer.”

“What grade would you give it?” I baited him.

“A minus.”

Really? Some of my happiness flooded back. “You have twenty-one more minutes.”

I set the timer, and he settled back onto the couch. When the buzzer went off, he set the book down and ran to the study.

After he’d gone to bed, I went into the living room to put it back in the library bag, but it was gone. Going into his room, I saw it on his night stand.

Sometimes, you just have to reel them in slowly.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

THE HELP Follow-Up Review

I finished The Help at 2:19 this morning.  (See my March 8th post if you haven’t read the first half review.) Good book! I was not disappointed after page 200. A few things cropped up in the second half that nudged me as a writer, but as a reader, I loved it. It had a nice pace, light suspense, and was very descriptive. The characters were easy to empathize with, and the description and backstory were perfectly blended with the action. I was very happy that it was over 400 pages, because I hate reading a great book and then having it end too soon. This was just right. 

As a writer, I was startled when about three-quarters of the way through the book, it abruptly switched from first person to third person. I had to read the first page of that chapter three times for it to sink in that it was not Skeeter speaking, but an omniscient narrator with a similar speech pattern. The book went right back to first person directly afterward, but I found it quite disruptive. Granted, all three of the MC’s were involved in the scene, and it would not have been easy to convey the complex events of that particular chapter from only one perspective, but I think that it could have been done.

I was also surprised that the author confessed at the end of the book to having been less than accurate with a few of her historical facts. Shake ‘n Bake was referenced, for example, even though in actuality it would not yet have been invented. That can be a slippery slope. I personally strive for authenticity in that regard, even researching dialogue to make sure that common phrases (such as “spilled the beans”) had been coined by the time period I’m writing.

In spite of these minor hiccups, I highly recommend the book, and am happy to own it. Great job, Kathryn Stockett!

Layinda’s Blog Final Rating: ¶¶¶¶

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Too Much Smiling Hurts Your Face

Why are there so many words for frowngrimace, and the like, but so few for smile and grin? According to thesaurus.com, synonyms for smile include: “grin,” “beam,” “twinkle,” “smirk,” “simper,” and “leer.” Grin lists: “smirk.” That’s it. And most of those don’t really indicate happiness. If one feels compelled to include a happy scene in one’s novel, it can be tediously irritating to come up with description that is not repetitive. By the time I’m done writing one, the last thing I am is happy.

I just read about a study done by the University of Maryland http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/sociss/release.cfm?ArticleID=1789
indicating that happy people watch less T.V., preferring to read or socialize. This brings to mind the Great Depression, when everyone was so stressed that the public flocked to “happy” movies, with stars like Shirley Temple, Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire. Now the hopeless watch T.V. (Dancing with the Stars, anyone?)

Conversely, if people who read are already happy, do they like more depressing fare? Hence the lack of need for “smile” and “grin.” Hmmm.

Maybe I’ll flip on the T.V. I’m still feeling a little down from writing that happy scene.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

So Far, So Good: Middle of the Book Review: The Help

The Help, by Kathryn Stockett, has been sitting unopened on my nightstand for more than three weeks. My book group is reading it for our end-of-April meeting, but I didn’t want to start it too soon, for fear of forgetting the details. Saturday night, I found myself with a few spare hours on my hands, and my willpower evaporated. I sat down to read at six-thirty and didn’t budge for 200 pages. For the rest of the weekend I was too busy to get back to it, but found myself reflecting on it often.

You might find it odd that someone is reviewing a book that she has not yet finished, but I have some very good reasons for doing so. One is, it won’t spoil the ending for anyone! The other is that I want to get back to reading it, but have to write today’s post, and this seems like the ideal compromise.

The Help takes place in 1962 Mississippi, during the Civil Rights movement. Factual events are artfully mixed with the fictitious lives of two maids and a privileged college graduate who has dreams of becoming an editor. The book is told in the voices of these women, who take turns telling their concurrent stories.

Skeeter (a.k.a. Eugenia), the graduate, stumbles onto the idea to write about a maid’s perspective of working for families in Jackson. Aibileen and Minnie agree to share their experiences, even though the consequences for all of them could be dire. Along the way, various relationships intermingle with their growing determination to get the book published. An intriguing subplot, which I am pretty sure will supply a twist by the end, is Skeeter’s search for Constantine, the maid who raised her. (I have some theories about this, but won’t share them so as not to spoil anyone else’s predictions. I’m also pretty certain what was wrong with Minnie’s pie!)

My main criticism thus far is that the characters, while likable and engaging, are somewhat stereotypical: the good hearted and selfless Aibileen, the good hearted and outspoken Minnie, the well intentioned but naïve Skeeter. A few believability issues have cropped up for me, as well. How could the fair minded and unprejudiced Skeeter have known friends Hilly and Elizabeth for so long without noticing what malicious bigots they were? Why on earth would someone like Skeeter be friends with those girls in the first place, and frankly, why would they be friends with her? I also had some initial issues with the use of first person, present tense. While the two maids’ stories flowed smoothly, the use of present tense blending with their dialect, its use in Skeeter’s story was a little jarring until I became accustomed to it.

These things are by no means deal breakers. The Help is the best book I’ve read in a long time. Ms. Stockett, a first time novelist, has woven an absorbing and well-written tale of Southern women, different in color, but the same in every other way. Read it! You won’t be sorry (at least until after page 200!).

Layinda’s Blog Midpoint Rating: ¶¶¶¶

a

Note: With 36 people signed up ahead of me for the library copy, I decided to buy it so that I could read at my leisure. I was happy to discover that the hardback edition is on sale at Amazon.com for $9.50 (it was originally $24.99). The paperback edition is not yet available, but will be soon, if the clearance price is any indication. Here is the link to it on Amazon: Amazon.com Widgets

a

a

P.S. Although many people viewed “Line in the Sand,” no one submitted an entry, so there are no winners!
[Or losers – I get to keep my $10! ;)]

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Oldies but Goodies: Great Books for Seventh Graders

Since the Young Adult book explosion, most librarians have no trouble suggesting good reads for seventh graders. Recent ones. Here are a few that aren’t so recent, but are still at the top of my recommended reading list for that age. I must confess that I have included a few newer titles that weren’t from my childhood at all, but I read them for my grad class, Reading Methods for Adolescents, and they are very good.

A few, like Are You There, God, It’s Me, Margaret seem a little juvenile for today’s sophisticated readers, but are still good books. I was irked to see that several of my seventh grade favorites are listed on Amazon as being for 9-12 year olds, which I disagree with. When they were published, that is not the group they were aimed at. Do you really want your third grader reading about the angst of waiting to get your period? (See my post: Considering Asynchronous Development in Book Selection). Sorry, my unfashionable personal bias is showing.

As usual, to see the list, click on:

Amazon.com Widgets

Touch any individual title, and you will go directly to that page on Amazon.com, where you will be able to view the description and reviews.

Enjoy!

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

What Day Do Soldiers Hate the Most?

Answer: March fourth. (March forth!) 🙂

a

Not only do I love old books, I also love old riddles. Since today was the inspiration for one of my lifelong favorites (I got it out of a Cracker Jack box in fourth grade), I am making March Fourth “Official Riddle Day” on Layinda’s Blog. A few of these are from when I was little, and a few are from when my grandparents were little, but do riddles ever really go out of style?

a

What do you call four ducks in a box?
A box of quackers!

a

What’s 5q + 5q?
10q. (You’re welcome!)

a

A little round man in a little red coat, a cane in his hand and a stone in his throat. What is he?
A cherry.

a

Twenty white horses upon a red hill, now they champ, now they stamp, now they stand still. What are they?
Your teeth! (This is an old one – maybe back then, twenty was about all anyone had!)

a

What goes up the chimney down, but not down the chimney up?
An umbrella.

a

What is black and white and re(a)d all over?
A newspaper.

a

What is black and white and black and white and black and white and black and white?
A penguin rolling down a hill. 

a

Know any good ones? Feel free to post them in the comments section.

a

a

P.S. Tomorrow is the last day to post flash-fiction entries for Line in the Sand.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Whatever Happened to Dick and Jane?

Warning: Pet Peeve Ahead

In the winter of 1998, my “Children’s Literature” professor stated that Dick and Jane books weren’t considered literature, and therefore had no business being used in schools. I disagreed, but felt that I had to respect the virtue of her opinion, no matter how misguided I thought it was.

Until yesterday.

I was innocently reading a Writer’s Almanac e-article about Dr. Seuss’s birthday, when I discovered that the literary companions of my youth had not been victims of literature purists, but instead had been steamrolled out of the curriculum by a sneering education specialist and his love of phonics.* Rudolph Flesch.

The March 2, 2010 Writer’s Almanac article (read the whole thing at http://writersalmanac.publicradio.org/) read in part, “A big study came out in the 1950s called “Why Johnny Can’t Read.” It was by an Austrian immigrant to the U.S. [Rudolf Flesch], an education specialist who argued that the Dick and Jane primers being used to teach reading in grade school classrooms across America were boring and, worse, not an effective method for teaching reading. He called them “horrible, stupid, emasculated, pointless, tasteless little readers,” which went “through dozens and dozens of totally unexciting middle-class, middle-income, middle-IQ children’s activities that offer opportunities for reading ‘Look, look’ or ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘Come, come’ or ‘See the funny, funny animal.'”

Humph! Obviously, in addition to being just plain irritating, the man never read a Dick and Jane book when he was little. (If he had, he might have become a nicer person. 🙂 ) After his study was published in 1955 and Flesch was written up in Time magazine, the educational establishment reacted like lemmings on a warm day, and Dick and Jane were sacrificed in the name of a biased theory. Unfortunately, the condescending Mr. Flesch doesn’t seem to have considered child development in his diatribe treatise.

For a beginning reader, pictures, repetition, sounding out words, and sight words are all important, as are enjoyment of the story and empathy with the subject matter. Children are going from their birth “language” of visual images to coding/symbols and the visual clues are important to link with the words they are learning to encode/decode. Sort of like training wheels. Dick and Jane books are filled with silly humor, have engaging pictures, are easy to read, and the repetition cements the words in a child’s brain. Oral reading at school is not a trial because once a child has heard the words while reading along, he/she can easily recognise and repeat them.

When I was little, I loved Dick and Jane. I learned to read in kindergarten, but recall using Dick and Jane through first grade. I still remember some of the stories. One, in particular, was about when Dick and Jane were at school on a rainy day and had to draw pictures of things they saw on the way to school. One student held his picture up for the class, and it looked like the arm on a metronome. None of his classmates could identify it, and it turned out that it was the single (centered) windshield wiper on his father’s car. I think it stuck with me because I had only seen cars with two windshield wipers, and thought it was interesting. Apparently Mr. Flesch didn’t read that one. I also recall a great fondness for Puff the cat.

In the last few years, there has been a resurgence of Dick and Jane books on the market, compilations of various early readers. I have purchased the ones I’ve seen, and my sons have appreciated them, too. They clearly enjoyed a feeling of mastery at being able to read a “book” with so little experience, and they liked the stories. My younger son used one for a first grade book report, displaying for the class his newfound confidence in reading, and was not shy to read aloud (the foundation of public speaking).

In 1980, Flesch published another book: Why Johnny Still Can’t Read. Apparently he finally realized that Dick and Jane weren’t the real problem, but the damage had already been done. I have read the little books that my sons bring home from school for “reading homework,” and to paraphrase former senator Lloyd Bentsen, they are no Dick and Jane.q

* I’ll discuss the benefits of combining phonics with whole language learning in a future post. Also the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level tool in Microsoft word.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Not Enough Hours in the Day

Got busy today – will post tomorrow! 🙂

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

(Whom) To Be or Not to Be

Carolyn Keene, F.W. Dixon, Mark Twain and Victoria Holt all have one thing in common. They are all fictitious names used by writers. Nom de plume, pen name, pseudonym — all are terms for names employed in lieu of one’s own.

Common reasons for an author to use an assumed name include personal privacy, genre (not many romances list a man’s name as the author!), writing multiple genres that are very different from each other, choosing a maiden name over a married one, taking the opportunity to right a wrong done at birth, and political reasons, like Francois Marie Arouet (Voltaire) and Thomas Paine.

Some particularly famous pseudonyms are Lewis Carroll (Charles Dodgson), O. Henry (William Sydney Porter), and of course, Dr. Seuss (Theodore Geisel). Although their real names are now commonly known, at the time their first books were published, the authors enjoyed anonymity.

Whatever the reason for wanting a nom de plume, how should one go about choosing it? On Agent Query Connect this past weekend there was a thread discussing the topic, and someone suggested the time tested method of combining the name of a pet with the name of the street one grew up on. Some people choose an old family name, or middle name, or the name(s) of their children. Others prefer a name based on the genre that they write, like Carolyn Keene of Nancy Drew fame (feminine, yet no nonsense and clever sounding). Some just pick one that they like a lot. Samuel Clemens used a riverboat term from his days as a captain on the Mississippi.

Whatever the name you choose, make sure to Google it first (in quotations), to make sure that the name of choice has no unsavory doppelgangers.

Based on some of the above criteria, my pen name could be Buster Clifton, Linda Everett Parker, or Layinda Parker, although I’ve written a boy book. Perhaps I should go the Hardy Boys route and pick a man’s name, like George Sand (Amantine Aurore Lucile Dupinand) and George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) did. I could just go with Everett Parker, or Parker Everett… but Jean Craighead George wrote boy books and so did Elizabeth George Speare and they kept their names. All the Georges did pretty well. Perhaps I should add a George to my name…. Layinda George? Hmmm. I just took a moment to Google that, and aside from being the pseudonym of an Argentinian woman who got to Twitter before I did (I had to go with layindalayinda and am still grumpy about it), there was nothing bad. So, maybe.

But I also googled my own name and the first 162 entries were ME! It seems that maybe I should just go with that. I might still add a George though, just in case.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized